I am in a
fraternity and we have had to deal with multiple problems as a group. One
example of a problem we had to deal with was a couple years ago one of our
members was acting foolishly and shot someone with an airsoft gun from the
chapter house. This led to the victim approaching our house and beating up our
president to the point where he had to go to the hospital for his injuries. The
problem that resulted is eventually the IFC found out and our charter was in
hot water. It took us a while to find out who the assailant was but eventually
we did. The chapter was at a bit of a standstill; if we ratted out one of our
members he would surely be expelled from the university. At the same time we
have to preserve the integrity of our chapter and the years of hard work we put
to maintain it. This led to our executive committee breaking all ties with the
member of our fraternity who committed the heinous act and that also led to his
expulsion from the university of Illinois. Some people were unhappy because they
felt we ruined his future by getting him in trouble with the university; some
people were angry towards him for bringing negative attention towards our
fraternity, especially considering the modern day opinion towards fraternities
nationwide.
Another example
of a conflict in the work force is from the fictional TV show of law and order:
special victims unit. I watch this show a lot and one episode really stuck out
to me. One of the detectives, Elliot, is a very passion officer but at that the
same time has the reputation of being a hothead. This is especially so when
dealing with criminals who are child molesters or serial killers. One episode a
teenager was accused of trying to rape older women. There was not enough
evidence to convict him but the detectives let him know that the investigation
will eventually prove him guilty. At one point, detective Elliot and the boy
were alone and a neutral cop was walking by. The boy noticed that someone was
coming and pretended that he was getting touched inappropriately and yelled “hey
stop touching me there”. Then two days later he reported that detective Elliot
had molested him and the cop who was walking by was interviewed. He stated that
he had heard the kid say the aforementioned but could not see what was
happening. Elliot was put on suspension pending an internal investigation and
the New York special victims unit had lost their best detective. The staff
helped handle the situation by all backing his character and working even
harder on the case now that they had to work overtime. I feel like in a
situation like this there is very little you can do because you cannot control
erratic behavior by a sociopathic fifteen year old. Also, the public will
always side with the victim and the fact that the teenager was able to plan it
strategically really helped make it look believable. It was very unfortunate
but it is a part of life and your plans do not always go the way you expect them
to. The main thing is that Elliot was able to handle the adversity and
maintained his innocence as he let the court system play out. It was sad that
his reputation was tarnished and people were calling him insults such as child
molester and creep. In the end, the child was overwhelmed with guilt and got
caught trying to rape another women. He cried that he had an alcohol problem
and confessed to lying about everything. People felt bad for him because he was
a distraught teen with serious mental problems as a result of his father
leaving him at a young age. Regardless, Elliot was free but it was an extremely
difficult situation to go through and I feel bad for people who have to go
through something similar to that in real life.
Let me stick with the first episode, since that one was real. In your telling of the story, the motive of the kid who did the shooting was not mentioned. Do you know why he did it?
ReplyDeleteI had never heard of an airsoft gun before, as I'm not knowledgeable about guns. So I have a variety of questions about it. Was it owned by the kid who did the shooting? Was it consistent with the Fraternity's bylaws to have such a gun on the premises? Is there some other purpose for which such a gun might be used that people on the IFC would embrace?
There is then the question of whether this paper actually falls under the bylaws of your Fraternity. You presented this as something of a dilemma as to whether the kid should be reported or not. But to me this sure seemed like a criminal act, in which case there shouldn't have been any question about it at all.
It was a criminal act and legally should be reported. Airsoft guns do not penetrate the skin and thus do not provide a lethal purpose. However, it is still very painful if you are shot by one and our fraternity does not approve of that behavior. IFC did not approve and were willing to take legal action against our fraternity. He does not know why he did it, rather his excuse was that he was "drunk" and being stupid. The problem was people in his pledge class were hesitant to rat him out from simply a moral standpoint of seeing their best friend be suspended from the university for a whole year. He was in his second semester of junior year and had only one year left.
ReplyDelete